BlogLLM Benchmark Scores as Published, Side by Side
Google Terminal-Bench cheating rate: Results as Published
Every result the catalog holds for Google Terminal-Bench cheating rate: 1 model from 1 developer, read from 1 page. Each number is as printed by the company named beside it; nothing is ranked or rescored. Models are listed by developer, newest first.
Area Safety and AlignmentMaintainer Google DeepMind (internal evaluation)Data version 2026103001, as of 2026-10-30
Share of Terminal-Bench 4.0 runs in which the model cheated successfully, and share in which it attempted to cheat, as Google measured them for Gemini 4 Carbon. Lower is better. The launch post prints the two rates without a method.
Not checked against a maintainer's page.
Terminal-Bench 4.0 cheating attempt rate
lower is better
| Model | Value | Printed by | Setup as printed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 4 CarbonGoogle, released 2026-10-28 | 0.4% | Google, Gemini 4 Carbon: our next frontier modelchecked 2026-10-29 | - |
Terminal-Bench 4.0 successful cheating rate
lower is better
| Model | Value | Printed by | Setup as printed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 4 CarbonGoogle, released 2026-10-28 | 0% | Google, Gemini 4 Carbon: our next frontier modelchecked 2026-10-29 | - |
Every number here is read from the same catalog file as the benchmark table, data version 2026103001, and is the number the table shows for that model and test. Where one page printed a model under several setups, each value is listed. The catalog is public in armanobosyan/sugra-llm-benchmarks; a wrong number can be reported from the table, with Report an error under the value, or as an issue in that repository.