BlogLLM Benchmark Scores as Published, Side by Side

xAI Self-harm Refusals: Results as Published

Every result the catalog holds for xAI Self-harm Refusals: 3 models from 1 developer, read from 1 page. Each number is as printed by the company named beside it; nothing is ranked or rescored. Models are listed by developer, newest first.

Area Safety and AlignmentMaintainer xAI (internal evaluation)Data version 2026103001, as of 2026-10-30

xAI's Grok 4.7 model card (section 10.1, Self-harm refusals, in its mental-health part) checks whether the model declines to help with requests related to self-harm, including longer conversations, while still offering support and resources. A response also fails if the model refuses without redirecting the user to help, or cannot recognise the intent behind a message that implies self-harm or crisis. The reported figure is compliance, where a lower score is better, and the card does not describe the prompts.

Self-harm refusals compliance

lower is better

ModelValuePrinted bySetup as printed
Grok 4.7xAI, released 2026-09-211.05%xAI, Grok 4.7 model cardchecked 2026-10-14Effort: high
Grok 4.6xAI, released 2026-08-120.84%xAI, Grok 4.7 model cardchecked 2026-10-14Effort: high
Grok 4.5xAI, released 2026-07-160.5%xAI, Grok 4.7 model cardchecked 2026-10-14Effort: high

Every number here is read from the same catalog file as the benchmark table, data version 2026103001, and is the number the table shows for that model and test. Where one page printed a model under several setups, each value is listed. The catalog is public in armanobosyan/sugra-llm-benchmarks; a wrong number can be reported from the table, with Report an error under the value, or as an issue in that repository.