BlogLLM Benchmark Scores as Published, Side by Side

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8-Max: Benchmark Scores Side by Side

Every test both Claude Fable 5.1 by Anthropic and Qwen3.8-Max by Alibaba have a published number for: 18 tests in 7 areas. Each number is as printed, with the page it comes from and the setup it was run under; nothing is ranked or rescored, and two numbers under different setups are two results, not one comparison.

Models Claude Fable 5.1, Qwen3.8-MaxData version 2026103001, as of 2026-10-30

Model

What each developer prints on its own model page; a dash means it prints none.

FactClaude Fable 5.1Qwen3.8-Max
Released2026-09-012026-08-03
Context window1M1M
Max output128K131K
InputText, imageText, image, video
OutputTextText
WeightsClosedClosed

Knowledge Work

TestClaude Fable 5.1Qwen3.8-Max
AutomationBench
31.4%Anthropic, Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1, checked 2026-10-15; printed on 9 more pages
27.3%Alibaba, Qwen3.8-Max comparison, checked 2026-10-14; printed on 1 more page
GDPval-AA v2
1853Anthropic, Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1, checked 2026-10-15; printed on 1 more page
1739Z.ai, GLM-5.3 model card, checked 2026-10-15
JobBench
73.1Meta, Meta Muse Wonder model card, checked 2026-10-19Effort: max
53.4Alibaba, Qwen3.8-Max comparison, checked 2026-10-14
Vals Finance Agent v2
58.9%Google, Gemini 4 Argon, checked 2026-10-29; printed on 1 more page
50.6%Mistral AI, Mistral Large 4 (preview), checked 2026-10-15
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark
6.7%Google, Gemini 4 Argon, checked 2026-10-29; printed on 2 more pages
10.4%Mistral AI, Mistral Large 4 (preview), checked 2026-10-15

Agentic Coding

TestClaude Fable 5.1Qwen3.8-Max
SWE-Bench Pro
81.2%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1, checked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more pageEffort: max
67.7%Alibaba, Qwen3.8-Max comparison, checked 2026-10-14
DeepSWE v1.1
67.4%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1, checked 2026-10-25; printed on 5 more pages
56.6%Alibaba, Qwen3.8-Max comparison, checked 2026-10-14; printed on 2 more pages
Terminal-Bench 4.0
55.8%Anthropic, Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1, checked 2026-10-15; printed on 11 more pagesModel setup as reported: Release table; exact effort is unspecified here unless stated. See system card for full protocol.
60.9%Anthropic, Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1, checked 2026-10-15Model setup as reported: Second value printed in the Fable 5.1 cell as "60.9% (Mythos 5.1)": filed under the Fable 5.1 heading, the label names Claude Mythos 5.1.
ProgramBench Almost@1
55.5%Meta, Meta Muse Wonder model card, checked 2026-10-19; printed on 1 more pageEffort: max; Harness: mini-swe-agent
10.5%Z.ai, GLM-5.3 model card, checked 2026-10-15

Science and Math

TestClaude Fable 5.1Qwen3.8-Max
GPQA Diamond
93.7%Moonshot AI, Introducing Kimi K3.1 Pro, checked 2026-10-24; printed on 1 more pageEffort: max; Fallback: with fallback
92.6%Alibaba, Qwen3.8-Max comparison, checked 2026-10-14
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v2)
87.8%OpenAI, GPT-6 Astra, checked 2026-10-14
46.3%Epoch AI, Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, checked 2026-10-30Effort: xhigh
FrontierMath Tier 1-3 (v2)
90.2%Epoch AI, Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, checked 2026-10-30Effort: max
74.7%Epoch AI, Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, checked 2026-10-30Effort: xhigh

Cybersecurity

TestClaude Fable 5.1Qwen3.8-Max
ExploitBench
83%Moonshot AI, Introducing Kimi K3.1 Pro, checked 2026-10-24Effort: max; Fallback: with fallback
28.8%Z.ai, GLM-5.3 model card, checked 2026-10-15

General Knowledge and Reasoning

TestClaude Fable 5.1Qwen3.8-Max
Humanity's Last Exam (no tools)
60.9%Anthropic, Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1, checked 2026-10-15; printed on 3 more pagesTools: none
43.6%Alibaba, Qwen3.8-Max comparison, checked 2026-10-14
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)
65%Anthropic, Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1, checked 2026-10-15; printed on 5 more pagesTools: enabled; exact tools in source
56.2%Alibaba, Qwen3.8-Max comparison, checked 2026-10-14; printed on 1 more pageTools: enabled; exact tools in source
SimpleQA Verified
70.8%Epoch AI, Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, checked 2026-10-30Effort: max
45.8%Epoch AI, Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, checked 2026-10-30Effort: xhigh

Tool Use and Workflows

TestClaude Fable 5.1Qwen3.8-Max
Toolathlon Verified
77.8%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1, checked 2026-10-25; printed on 2 more pagesEffort: max
72.5%Alibaba, Qwen3.8-Max comparison, checked 2026-10-14; printed on 1 more page

Healthcare

TestClaude Fable 5.1Qwen3.8-Max
HealthBench
60.2Alibaba, Qwen3.8-Max comparison, checked 2026-10-14

Price

API list prices in US dollars per one million tokens, as printed on the developer's pricing page on the day checked; a dash means the developer lists that price in another unit or not at all. Cost per task is measured by Vals AI.

PriceClaude Fable 5.1Qwen3.8-Max
Input
$10Anthropic, Anthropic API pricing, checked 2026-10-15
$1.65Alibaba, Alibaba Model Studio pricing, checked 2026-10-15
Cached input
$0.25Anthropic, Anthropic API pricing, checked 2026-10-15
-
Cache write
$12.5Anthropic, Anthropic API pricing, checked 2026-10-15Cache: 5 minute cache
-
Cache write, 1 hour
$20Anthropic, Anthropic API pricing, checked 2026-10-15
-
Output
$50Anthropic, Anthropic API pricing, checked 2026-10-15
$4.951Alibaba, Alibaba Model Studio pricing, checked 2026-10-15
Input, batch
$5Anthropic, Anthropic API pricing, checked 2026-10-15
-
Output, batch
$25Anthropic, Anthropic API pricing, checked 2026-10-15
-
Cost per taskVals AI, USD, lower is better
$33.37Vals AI, Vibe Code Bench v1.1 leaderboard, checked 2026-10-27Harness: OpenHands
$8.24Vals AI, Vibe Code Bench v1.1 leaderboard, checked 2026-10-27Harness: OpenHands

Claude Fable 5.1 has 119 more and Qwen3.8-Max has 27 more: tests only one of them has a number for, listed on its model page.

More side by side

Every number here is read from the same catalog file as the benchmark table, data version 2026103001. A pair has a page when both models are their developers' flagships and both have a number for at least 10 of the same tests. Where one page printed a model under several setups, each value is listed. The catalog is public in armanobosyan/sugra-llm-benchmarks; a wrong number can be reported from the table, with Report an error under the value, or as an issue in that repository.