BlogLLM Benchmark Scores as Published, Side by Side

Claude Fable 5.1: Benchmark Scores as Published

Every result the catalog holds for Claude Fable 5.1: 137 tests in 16 areas, from 19 pages. 80 printed by Anthropic itself, the rest by the company named beside each number. Each number is as printed; nothing is ranked or rescored.

Developer AnthropicReleased 2026-09-01Context window 1MMax output 128KInput Text, imageOutput TextWeights ClosedData version 2026103001, as of 2026-10-30

Knowledge Work

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
AutomationBench31.4%Anthropic, Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-15; printed on 9 more pages-
GDPval-AA v21853Anthropic, Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-15; printed on 1 more page-
APEX-Agents68.6%Moonshot AI, Introducing Kimi K3.1 Prochecked 2026-10-24Effort: max; Fallback: with fallback
JobBench73.1Meta, Meta Muse Wonder model cardchecked 2026-10-19Effort: max
Vals Finance Agent v258.9%Google, Gemini 4 Argonchecked 2026-10-29; printed on 1 more page-
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark6.7%Google, Gemini 4 Argonchecked 2026-10-29; printed on 2 more pages-
OfficeQA Pro69%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25; printed on 2 more pages-
GDPval-AA v2.11735Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5checked 2026-10-14; printed on 4 more pages-
Vending-Bench 2 (final balance in USD)$5422Google, Gemini 4 Carbonchecked 2026-10-29-
AA-Briefcase v1.11678Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 3 more pagesEffort: max
AA-Briefcase1611Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25Effort: high
1686Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25Effort: xhigh
1694Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25Effort: max
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (criterion pass rate)90.81%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25Dataset revision: public set
93.3%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25Effort: xhigh; Dataset revision: held-out set
OfficeQA80.2%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more page-
GDP.pdf w/ python (mean rubric pass rate)85.1%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more pageTools: python
Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 (tasks meeting every criterion)16.7%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more pageEffort: xhigh
Business Operation (Internal)30.7%Moonshot AI, Introducing Kimi K3.1 Prochecked 2026-10-24Effort: max; Fallback: with fallback
FrontierFinance60.8%Moonshot AI, Introducing Kimi K3.1 Prochecked 2026-10-24Effort: max; Harness: Finance Agent v2; Fallback: with fallback
OfficeQA Pro v254.5%Moonshot AI, Introducing Kimi K3.1 Prochecked 2026-10-24Effort: max; Harness: Claude Code; Fallback: with fallback
Vals Index65.8%Google, Gemini 4 Argonchecked 2026-10-29-
Harvey Legal Agent (public set, all-pass rate)19.09%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more page-
GDP.pdf mean criteria pass rate85.4%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25Tools: none

Agentic Coding

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
SWE-Bench Pro81.2%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more pageEffort: max
DeepSWE v1.167.4%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25; printed on 5 more pages-
SWE-bench Multilingual89.1%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more pageEffort: max
Terminal-Bench 4.055.8%Anthropic, Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-15; printed on 11 more pagesModel setup as reported: Release table; exact effort is unspecified here unless stated. See system card for full protocol.
60.9%Anthropic, Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-15Model setup as reported: Second value printed in the Fable 5.1 cell as "60.9% (Mythos 5.1)": filed under the Fable 5.1 heading, the label names Claude Mythos 5.1.
ProgramBench Almost@155.5%Meta, Meta Muse Wonder model cardchecked 2026-10-19; printed on 1 more pageEffort: max; Harness: mini-swe-agent
SWE-Marathon45.6%Meta, Meta Muse Wonder model cardchecked 2026-10-19; printed on 1 more pageEffort: max
ProgramBench87.6%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more page-
FrontierCode v1.1 Main50.9%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25; printed on 3 more pagesEffort: medium
FrontierSWE v257%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25; printed on 5 more pages-
FrontierCode v1.1 Extended63.6%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25; printed on 2 more pagesEffort: medium
CursorBench 4.051.8%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5checked 2026-10-14; printed on 2 more pages-
SWE-Bench Multimodal54.7%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more pageEffort: max
Kimi Code Bench 3.0 Long-horizon58.8%Moonshot AI, Introducing Kimi K3.1 Prochecked 2026-10-24Effort: max; Fallback: with fallback
CursorBench 3.2.073.4%Anthropic, Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-15; printed on 1 more page-
SWE-sweep2.9%Google, Gemini 4 Carbonchecked 2026-10-29-
Internal Database Migration Tasks57.8%OpenAI, GPT-6 Astrachecked 2026-10-14-
Vibe Code Bench90.3%Google, Gemini 4 Argonchecked 2026-10-29-

ML Engineering

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
PostTrainBench v1.140.2%Google, Gemini 4 Argonchecked 2026-10-29-
PostTrainBench v1.244.6%Moonshot AI, Introducing Kimi K3.1 Prochecked 2026-10-24Effort: max; Dataset revision: v1.2; Fallback: with fallback

Science and Math

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
GPQA Diamond93.7%Moonshot AI, Introducing Kimi K3.1 Prochecked 2026-10-24; printed on 1 more pageEffort: max; Fallback: with fallback
Terminal-Bench Science 0.152.6%Anthropic, Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-15; printed on 8 more pages-
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v2)87.8%OpenAI, GPT-6 Astrachecked 2026-10-14-
FrontierMath Tier 1-3 (v2)90.2%Epoch AI, Epoch AI Benchmarking Hubchecked 2026-10-30Effort: max
LAB-Bench 268.6%Google, Gemini 4 Argonchecked 2026-10-29-
Morphology-to-molecule matching25.8%Anthropic, Claude Sonnet 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Effort: max
BioMysteryBench81.6%Moonshot AI, Introducing Kimi K3.1 Prochecked 2026-10-24Effort: max; Fallback: with fallback
ArXivMath (August 2026), with tools92.1%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more pageEffort: max; Tools: enabled
87.7%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25Effort: high; Tools: enabled
RiemannBench65.6%Google, Gemini 4 Argonchecked 2026-10-29; printed on 1 more page-
ArXivMath (August 2026), no tools82.9%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more pageEffort: max; Tools: none

Long Context

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
GraphWalks BFS up to 128k (F1)91.4%Google, Gemini 4 Argonchecked 2026-10-29-
GraphWalks BFS 256k to 1M (F1)65%Google, Gemini 4 Argonchecked 2026-10-29; printed on 1 more page-
MemoryBench (Meta internal)79%Meta, Meta Muse Wonder model cardchecked 2026-10-19Effort: max

Computer Use

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
OSWorld 2.0 partial77.9%Anthropic, Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-15; printed on 2 more pages-
OSWorld 2.1 partial80.7%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5checked 2026-10-14; printed on 2 more pages-
OSWorld 2.1 offline subset76.8%Google, Gemini 4 Carbonchecked 2026-10-29-
OSWorld 2.1 binary43.1%Meta, Meta Muse Wonder model cardchecked 2026-10-19Effort: max
OSWorld 2.0 strict41.7%Anthropic, Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-15; printed on 2 more pages-

Multimodal Understanding

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
CharXiv Reasoning (no tools)88.8%Moonshot AI, Introducing Kimi K3.1 Prochecked 2026-10-24Effort: max; Tools: none; Fallback: with fallback
MMMU-Pro86.3%Moonshot AI, Introducing Kimi K3.1 Prochecked 2026-10-24Effort: max; Tools: none; Fallback: with fallback
GDP.pdf27.6%Meta, Meta Muse Wonder model cardchecked 2026-10-19; printed on 1 more pageEffort: max
CharXiv Reasoning (with tools)92.7%Moonshot AI, Introducing Kimi K3.1 Prochecked 2026-10-24Effort: max; Tools: python; Fallback: with fallback
BabyVision (with tools)95.1%Moonshot AI, Introducing Kimi K3.1 Prochecked 2026-10-24Effort: max; Tools: python; Fallback: with fallback
MMMU-Pro (with tools)88.4%Moonshot AI, Introducing Kimi K3.1 Prochecked 2026-10-24Effort: max; Tools: python; Fallback: with fallback
LVBench79.7%Google, Gemini 4 Argonchecked 2026-10-29-
Chartography (no tools)42.6%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25; printed on 4 more pagesEffort: max; Tools: none
Chartography (with tools)86.2%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25; printed on 4 more pagesEffort: max; Tools: enabled
ZeroBench (with tools, pass@5)59%Moonshot AI, Introducing Kimi K3.1 Prochecked 2026-10-24Effort: max; Tools: python; Attempt budget: pass@5; Fallback: with fallback
PerceptionBench63%Moonshot AI, Introducing Kimi K3.1 Prochecked 2026-10-24Effort: max; Tools: none; Fallback: with fallback
ZeroBench (pass@5)35%Moonshot AI, Introducing Kimi K3.1 Prochecked 2026-10-24Effort: max; Tools: none; Fallback: with fallback
ZeroBench_main (avg@5)23%Moonshot AI, Introducing Kimi K3.1 Prochecked 2026-10-24Effort: max; Tools: none; Fallback: with fallback

Cybersecurity

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
ExploitBench83%Moonshot AI, Introducing Kimi K3.1 Prochecked 2026-10-24Effort: max; Fallback: with fallback
ExploitGym30.4%Moonshot AI, Introducing Kimi K3.1 Prochecked 2026-10-24; printed on 1 more pageEffort: max; Fallback: with fallback
CWE-bench v158%Google, Gemini 4 Argonchecked 2026-10-29; printed on 2 more pages-

General Knowledge and Reasoning

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
Humanity's Last Exam (no tools)60.9%Anthropic, Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-15; printed on 3 more pagesTools: none
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)65%Anthropic, Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-15; printed on 5 more pagesTools: enabled; exact tools in source
SimpleQA Verified70.8%Epoch AI, Epoch AI Benchmarking Hubchecked 2026-10-30Effort: max
ARC-AGI-290%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more pageEffort: max
ARC-AGI-197.5%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more pageEffort: max
Humanity's Last Exam Diamond (no tools)55.1%Moonshot AI, Introducing Kimi K3.1 Prochecked 2026-10-24Effort: max; Tools: none; Fallback: with fallback
Kimi Hallu Bench Hard w/ tools (lower is better)lower is better23.3%Moonshot AI, Introducing Kimi K3.1 Prochecked 2026-10-24Effort: max; Tools: with tools; Fallback: with fallback
Kimi Hallu Bench w/o tools (lower is better)lower is better11.4%Moonshot AI, Introducing Kimi K3.1 Prochecked 2026-10-24Effort: max; Tools: none; Fallback: with fallback

Tool Use and Workflows

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
Toolathlon Verified77.8%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25; printed on 2 more pagesEffort: max
Toolathlon Verified Pass@381.5%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25; printed on 2 more pagesEffort: max
Toolathlon Verified Pass^373.1%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25; printed on 2 more pagesEffort: max
Toolathlon Verified average assistant turnslower is better23.7Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more pageEffort: max

Instruction Following

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
HANDBOOK.md38.8%Moonshot AI, Introducing Kimi K3.1 Prochecked 2026-10-24Effort: max; Harness: OpenHands; Fallback: with fallback

Multilingual

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
Global-MMLU94%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25; printed on 3 more pagesEffort: max
MILU93%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25; printed on 3 more pagesEffort: max

Healthcare

Safety and Alignment

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
Gray Swan IPI (attack success rate after k attempts)attack success rate after k attempts, lower is better1%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19; printed on 2 more pages-
BBQ ambiguous accuracy99.97%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19; printed on 1 more page-
BBQ disambiguated accuracy89.92%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19; printed on 1 more page-
Benign request refusal rate (all languages)lower is better0.34%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19; printed on 1 more pageSetup as reported: Table 4.1.2.A, all tested languages, claude.ai
0%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Table 4.1.2.A, all tested languages, API
Child safety multi-turn appropriate response rate100%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19; printed on 1 more pageSetup as reported: Table 4.2.B, claude.ai
84%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Table 4.2.B, API, without a system prompt
Child safety single-turn harmless rate99.98%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19; printed on 1 more pageSetup as reported: Table 4.2.A, claude.ai
99.9%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Table 4.2.A, API
Child safety single-turn refusal ratelower is better0%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19; printed on 1 more pageSetup as reported: Table 4.2.A, API
0.17%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Table 4.2.A, claude.ai
Disordered eating single-turn harmless rate99.43%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19; printed on 1 more pageSetup as reported: Table 4.3.2.A, claude.ai
95.69%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Table 4.3.2.A, API
Disordered eating single-turn refusal ratelower is better0%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19; printed on 1 more pageSetup as reported: Table 4.3.2.A, API
0%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Table 4.3.2.A, claude.ai
Election integrity multi-turn appropriate response rate90%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19; printed on 1 more pageSetup as reported: Election integrity prompts (section 4.4.3), Table 4.4.3.B, API
88%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Election integrity prompts (section 4.4.3), Table 4.4.3.B, claude.ai
Election integrity single-turn harmless rate100%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19; printed on 1 more pageSetup as reported: Election integrity prompts (section 4.4.3), Table 4.4.3.A, claude.ai
100%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Election integrity prompts (section 4.4.3), Table 4.4.3.A, API
Election integrity single-turn refusal ratelower is better0%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19; printed on 1 more pageSetup as reported: Election integrity prompts (section 4.4.3), Table 4.4.3.A, API
0%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Election integrity prompts (section 4.4.3), Table 4.4.3.A, claude.ai
Harmful request harmless response rate (all languages)99.41%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19; printed on 1 more pageSetup as reported: Table 4.1.1.A, all tested languages, claude.ai
94.71%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Table 4.1.1.A, all tested languages, API
Pairwise even-handedness98.3%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Pairwise political bias evaluation (Figure 4.4.1.A-C); the card prints the values as bar labels, API
98.8%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Pairwise political bias evaluation (Figure 4.4.1.A-C); the card prints the values as bar labels, claude.ai
Pairwise opposing perspectives acknowledged25.9%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Pairwise political bias evaluation (Figure 4.4.1.A-C); the card prints the values as bar labels, API
80.5%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Pairwise political bias evaluation (Figure 4.4.1.A-C); the card prints the values as bar labels, claude.ai
Shade coding attack success rate (attempt level)lower is better8.7%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19; printed on 1 more pageSetup as reported: Shade indirect prompt injection attack success (scenario counts as printed in the card), coding, with probes: H5.5 0/40, Sonnet 5.5 13/40, Opus 5.5 36/40, Fable 5.1 35/40, Haiku 4.5 40/40
51.93%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Shade indirect prompt injection attack success (scenario counts as printed in the card), coding, no safeguards: H5.5 6/40, Sonnet 5.5 16/40, Opus 5.5 37/40, Fable 5.1 39/40, Haiku 4.5 40/40
Shade computer use attack success rate (attempt level)lower is better0.07%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19; printed on 1 more pageSetup as reported: Shade indirect prompt injection attack success (scenario counts as printed in the card), computer use GUI, with probes: 1/14 for Haiku 5.5, Sonnet 5.5 and Fable 5.1; 1/14 for Opus 5.5; 10/14 for Haiku 4.5
0.07%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Shade indirect prompt injection attack success (scenario counts as printed in the card), computer use GUI, no safeguards: 1/14 for Haiku 5.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5 and Fable 5.1; 13/14 for Haiku 4.5
Suicide and self-harm multi-turn appropriate response rate60%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19; printed on 1 more pageSetup as reported: Table 4.3.1.B, API
94%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Table 4.3.1.B, claude.ai
Suicide and self-harm single-turn harmless rate100%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19; printed on 1 more pageSetup as reported: Table 4.3.1.A, claude.ai
99.3%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Table 4.3.1.A, API
Suicide and self-harm single-turn refusal ratelower is better0%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19; printed on 1 more pageSetup as reported: Table 4.3.1.A, API
0.45%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Table 4.3.1.A, claude.ai
Primary misbehavior judge score, overall (18 tasks)lower is better1.57Google, Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Reportchecked 2026-10-19-
Browser use red-teamer attack success rate (attempt level)lower is better0%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19; printed on 1 more page-
Internal computer use safety benchmarklower is better9.5%OpenAI, GPT-6 Astrachecked 2026-10-14-
Multi-turn appropriate response rate: Bio weapons73%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Multi-turn, API (solid bars), Figure 4.1.3.A
89%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Multi-turn, claude.ai (hatched bars), Figure 4.1.3.A
Multi-turn appropriate response rate: Cyberattacks96%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Multi-turn, API (solid bars), Figure 4.1.3.A
99%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Multi-turn, claude.ai (hatched bars), Figure 4.1.3.A
Multi-turn appropriate response rate: Deadly weapons89%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Multi-turn, claude.ai (hatched bars), Figure 4.1.3.A
87%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Multi-turn, API (solid bars), Figure 4.1.3.A
Multi-turn appropriate response rate: Hate and discrimination95%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Multi-turn, claude.ai (hatched bars), Figure 4.1.3.A
97%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Multi-turn, API (solid bars), Figure 4.1.3.A
Multi-turn appropriate response rate: Influence operations76%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Multi-turn, claude.ai (hatched bars), Figure 4.1.3.A
65%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Multi-turn, API (solid bars), Figure 4.1.3.A
Multi-turn appropriate response rate: Romance scams94%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Multi-turn, API (solid bars), Figure 4.1.3.A
94%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Multi-turn, claude.ai (hatched bars), Figure 4.1.3.A
Multi-turn appropriate response rate: Tracking and surveillance83%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Multi-turn, claude.ai (hatched bars), Figure 4.1.3.A
73%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Multi-turn, API (solid bars), Figure 4.1.3.A
Multi-turn appropriate response rate: Violent extremism93%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Multi-turn, claude.ai (hatched bars), Figure 4.1.3.A
87%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Multi-turn, API (solid bars), Figure 4.1.3.A
Political refusals (Pairwise political refusal rate)Pairwise political refusal rate, lower is better5%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Pairwise political bias evaluation (Figure 4.4.1.A-C); the card prints the values as bar labels, claude.ai
2.1%Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Setup as reported: Pairwise political bias evaluation (Figure 4.4.1.A-C); the card prints the values as bar labels, API

Engineering and Design

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
BenchCAD92.6%Moonshot AI, Introducing Kimi K3.1 Prochecked 2026-10-24; printed on 1 more pageEffort: max; Tools: with tools; Fallback: with fallback
Blueprint-Bench 2 (normalized score)41.9%Google, Gemini 4 Carbonchecked 2026-10-29-
EEBench reward56.4%xAI, Grok 4.7checked 2026-10-25Effort: max
BenchCAD Vision2Code, no tools (voxel IoU)0.437Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25; printed on 2 more pagesTools: none
BenchCAD Vision2Code, with tools (voxel IoU)0.843Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25; printed on 2 more pagesTools: enabled
BenchCAD w/o tools60.6%Moonshot AI, Introducing Kimi K3.1 Prochecked 2026-10-24Effort: max; Tools: none; Fallback: with fallback

Preference and Composite Rankings

Price

API list prices in US dollars per one million tokens, as printed on the developer's pricing page on the day checked. Cost per task is measured by Vals AI.

PriceValuePrinted bySetup as printed
Input$10Anthropic, Anthropic API pricingchecked 2026-10-15-
Cached input$0.25Anthropic, Anthropic API pricingchecked 2026-10-15-
Cache write$12.5Anthropic, Anthropic API pricingchecked 2026-10-15Cache: 5 minute cache
Cache write, 1 hour$20Anthropic, Anthropic API pricingchecked 2026-10-15-
Output$50Anthropic, Anthropic API pricingchecked 2026-10-15-
Input, batch$5Anthropic, Anthropic API pricingchecked 2026-10-15-
Output, batch$25Anthropic, Anthropic API pricingchecked 2026-10-15-
Cost per taskVals AI, USD, lower is better$33.37Vals AI, Vibe Code Bench v1.1 leaderboardchecked 2026-10-27Harness: OpenHands

Side by side

More from Anthropic

Every number here is read from the same catalog file as the benchmark table, data version 2026103001. Where one page printed the model under several setups, each value is listed. The catalog is public in armanobosyan/sugra-llm-benchmarks; a wrong number can be reported from the table, with Report an error under the value, or as an issue in that repository.