BlogLLM Benchmark Scores as Published, Side by Side

Claude Opus 5: Benchmark Scores as Published

Every result the catalog holds for Claude Opus 5: 109 tests in 17 areas, from 20 pages. 67 printed by Anthropic itself, the rest by the company named beside each number. Each number is as printed; nothing is ranked or rescored.

Developer AnthropicReleased 2026-07-24Context window 1MMax output 128KInput Text, imageOutput TextWeights ClosedData version 2026103001, as of 2026-10-30

Knowledge Work

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
AutomationBench26%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5checked 2026-10-15; printed on 10 more pages-
GDPval-AA v21861Anthropic, Claude Opus 5checked 2026-10-15; printed on 3 more pages-
JobBench65.7Xiaomi, Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro-RL model cardchecked 2026-10-19-
Vals Finance Agent v258.6%Google, Gemini 3.8 Flash model cardchecked 2026-10-15-
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark11.7%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5checked 2026-10-15; printed on 1 more page-
OfficeQA Pro66.9%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more page-
GDPval-AA v2.11708Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5checked 2026-10-14; printed on 2 more pages-
AA-Briefcase v1.11673Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25Effort: max
AA-Briefcase1685Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25Effort: max
OfficeQA78.1%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more page-
GDP.pdf w/ python (mean rubric pass rate)85.5%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25Tools: python
Apex Bench v1.165.8%DeepSeek, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 model cardchecked 2026-10-18-
GDP.pdf mean criteria pass rate83.4%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25Tools: none

Agentic Coding

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
SWE-Bench Pro79.2%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more pageEffort: max
Terminal-Bench 2.189.1%DeepSeek, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 2 more pages-
DeepSWE v1.168.8%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5checked 2026-10-15; printed on 6 more pages-
SWE-bench Multilingual89.5%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more pageEffort: max
Terminal-Bench 4.052.3%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5checked 2026-10-14; printed on 10 more pages-
NL2Repo-Bench75.3DeepSeek, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 2 more pages-
ProgramBench Almost@137%DeepSeek, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 2 more pages-
ProgramBench85.4%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more page-
FrontierCode v1.1 Main53.4%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5checked 2026-10-15; printed on 3 more pages-
Terminal-Bench 3.043.3%DeepSeek, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash model cardchecked 2026-10-15-
FrontierSWE v252%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25-
FrontierCode v1.1 Extended63.6%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more page-
SWE-Marathon v1.1 (resolution rate)50%xAI, Grok 4.7 model cardchecked 2026-10-14Effort: max
CursorBench 4.046.6%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5checked 2026-10-14; printed on 1 more page-
SWE-Bench Multimodal59.4%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more pageEffort: max
CursorBench 3.2.070%Anthropic, Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-15; printed on 1 more page-
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.468.1OpenAI, GPT-6 Astrachecked 2026-10-14-
MiMo Code Bench (Xiaomi internal)68.6%Xiaomi, Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro-RL model cardchecked 2026-10-19-
MiMo VisualCoding (Xiaomi internal)70%Xiaomi, Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro-RL model cardchecked 2026-10-19-
Frontier-Bench v0.143.3%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5checked 2026-10-15Harness: mini-SWE-agent (Anthropic internal run)

ML Engineering

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
PostTrainBench v1.140.4%MiniMax, MiniMax-M3.1-Flash model cardchecked 2026-10-25Dataset revision: v1.1

Science and Math

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
GPQA Diamond93.4%DeepSeek, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 1 more page-
BioMysteryBench Human Difficult49.4%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5checked 2026-10-15; printed on 3 more pages-
Terminal-Bench Science 0.129%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5checked 2026-10-14; printed on 6 more pages-
BioMysteryBench Human Solvable90.1%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5checked 2026-10-15; printed on 3 more pages-
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v2)73.2%OpenAI, GPT-6 Astrachecked 2026-10-14-
LAB-Bench 284.2%Google, Gemini 3.8 Flash model cardchecked 2026-10-15-
SciCode-Verified91.3%Mistral AI, Mistral Large 4 (preview)checked 2026-10-15Attempt budget: pass@1 (n=6)
Protocol Understanding (V2)71.8%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more page-
Protocols Troubleshooting68.9%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more page-
Morphology-to-molecule matching25%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25-
LatchBio SingleCellBench60.5%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more page-
LatchBio SpatialBench Verified71.7%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more page-
Protein sequence generation42.4%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more page-
ADME medicinal chemistry (504 questions)57.9%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25-
Biomedical image analysis61%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25-
Organic chemistry V265.7%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25-
ProteinGym Hard47.7%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25-
ArXivMath (August 2026), with tools90.4%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25Effort: max; Tools: enabled
De novo binder design78.9%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25-
Protein library ranking53.5%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25-
ArXivMath (August 2026), no tools78.1%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25Effort: max; Tools: none

Long Context

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
LOCA-Bench (256k environment description)53.7%MiniMax, MiniMax-M3.1-Flash model cardchecked 2026-10-25-

Computer Use

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
OSWorld-Verified83.4%Xiaomi, Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro-RL model cardchecked 2026-10-19-
OSWorld 2.070.6%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5checked 2026-10-15; printed on 1 more page-
OSWorld 2.0 partial74%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 3 more pagesEffort: max
OSWorld 2.1 partial74%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5checked 2026-10-14-
OSWorld 2.0 strict37.2%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 2 more pagesEffort: max
OSWorld 2.0 offline partial70.2%OpenAI, GPT-6 Astrachecked 2026-10-14; printed on 1 more page-

Multimodal Understanding

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
CharXiv Reasoning (no tools)83.7%Google, Gemini 3.8 Flash model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 1 more pageTools: none
GDP.pdf21.6%MiniMax, MiniMax-M3.1-Flash model cardchecked 2026-10-25-
BabyVision (with tools)94.1%DeepSeek, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 2 more pagesTools: enabled; exact tools in source
LVBench75.4%Google, Gemini 3.8 Flash model cardchecked 2026-10-15-
Chartography (no tools)29.8%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more pageEffort: max; Tools: none
Chartography (with tools)83.4%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5checked 2026-10-14; printed on 4 more pagesTools: enabled; exact tools in source
ZeroBench (with tools, pass@5)52%DeepSeek, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 1 more pageTools: enabled; exact tools in source
GDP.pdf (all-pass rate)37%Google, Gemini 3.8 Flash model cardchecked 2026-10-15-

Cybersecurity

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
ExploitBench70%OpenAI, GPT-6 Astrachecked 2026-10-14; printed on 1 more page-
ExploitGym22.1%DeepSeek, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 2 more pages-
SRE-Bench12.5%OpenAI, GPT-6 Astrachecked 2026-10-14-

General Knowledge and Reasoning

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
Humanity's Last Exam (no tools)56.3%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5checked 2026-10-15; printed on 6 more pagesTools: none
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)64.7%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5checked 2026-10-15; printed on 6 more pagesTools: enabled; exact tools in source
ARC-AGI-290.42%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more pageEffort: max
ARC-AGI-197.5%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more pageEffort: max
Humanity's Last Exam (Verified)54.4%Google, Gemini 3.8 Flash model cardchecked 2026-10-15-
ARC-AGI-330.2%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5checked 2026-10-15; printed on 1 more page-

Tool Use and Workflows

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
Agents' Last Exam (pass rate)28.6%DeepSeek, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 3 more pages-
Toolathlon Verified80.6%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 3 more pagesEffort: max
Agents' Last Exam (score)55.5%OpenAI, GPT-6 Astrachecked 2026-10-14-
BankerToolBench76.2%MiniMax, MiniMax-M3.1-Flash model cardchecked 2026-10-25-
Toolathlon Verified Pass@387%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 2 more pagesEffort: max
Toolathlon Verified Pass^373.1%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 2 more pagesEffort: max
Toolathlon Verified average assistant turnslower is better23.5Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more pageEffort: max

Web Search and Research

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
BrowseComp90.8%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5checked 2026-10-15; printed on 1 more page-

Multilingual

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
Global-MMLU92.5%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more pageEffort: max
MILU92.1%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more pageEffort: max

Healthcare

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
HealthBench Professional (length-adjusted)59.8%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 2 more pagesEffort: max
HealthBench Professional59.8%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5checked 2026-10-15-
HealthBench (unadjusted)67.1Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more page-
HealthBench Professional (unadjusted)73.4%Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more page-
PhysicianBench57.6%Anthropic, Claude Sonnet 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19Effort: max

Biosecurity

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
BioSecBench Function44.8%xAI, Grok 4.7 model cardchecked 2026-10-14Effort: max
BioSecBench Refusal31.8%xAI, Grok 4.7 model cardchecked 2026-10-14Effort: max
BioSecBench Surveillance43.6%xAI, Grok 4.7 model cardchecked 2026-10-14Effort: max

Safety and Alignment

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
Gray Swan IPI (attack success rate after k attempts)attack success rate after k attempts, lower is better4.6%Google, Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Reportchecked 2026-10-19; printed on 1 more page-
Self-preference bias, Claude-identity system prompt (0-9 scale)lower is better-0.03Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19-
Self-preference bias, no system prompt (0-9 scale)lower is better0.05Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-19-
Internal computer use safety benchmarklower is better11.5%OpenAI, GPT-6 Astrachecked 2026-10-14-

Engineering and Design

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
BenchCAD82.1%OpenAI, GPT-6 Astrachecked 2026-10-14-
EEBench reward61.6%xAI, Grok 4.7 model cardchecked 2026-10-14Effort: max
BenchCAD Vision2Code, no tools (voxel IoU)0.497Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more pageTools: none
BenchCAD Vision2Code, with tools (voxel IoU)0.899Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5 System Cardchecked 2026-10-25; printed on 1 more pageTools: enabled
CADGenBench reward36.6%xAI, Grok 4.7 model cardchecked 2026-10-14Effort: max

Preference and Composite Rankings

Price

API list prices in US dollars per one million tokens, as printed on the developer's pricing page on the day checked. Cost per task is measured by Vals AI.

PriceValuePrinted bySetup as printed
Input$5Anthropic, Anthropic API pricingchecked 2026-10-15-
Cached input$0.5Anthropic, Anthropic API pricingchecked 2026-10-15-
Cache write$6.25Anthropic, Anthropic API pricingchecked 2026-10-15Cache: 5 minute cache
Cache write, 1 hour$10Anthropic, Anthropic API pricingchecked 2026-10-15-
Output$25Anthropic, Anthropic API pricingchecked 2026-10-15-
Input, batch$2.5Anthropic, Anthropic API pricingchecked 2026-10-15-
Output, batch$12.5Anthropic, Anthropic API pricingchecked 2026-10-15-
Input, fast$10Anthropic, Anthropic API pricingchecked 2026-10-15-
Output, fast$50Anthropic, Anthropic API pricingchecked 2026-10-15-
Cost per taskVals AI, USD, lower is better$33.88Vals AI, Vibe Code Bench v1.1 leaderboardchecked 2026-10-27Harness: OpenHands

More from Anthropic

Every number here is read from the same catalog file as the benchmark table, data version 2026103001. Where one page printed the model under several setups, each value is listed. The catalog is public in armanobosyan/sugra-llm-benchmarks; a wrong number can be reported from the table, with Report an error under the value, or as an issue in that repository.