BlogLLM Benchmark Scores as Published, Side by Side
USAMO: Results as Published
Every result the catalog holds for USAMO: 4 models from 4 developers, read from 1 page. Each number is as printed by the company named beside it; nothing is ranked or rescored. Models are listed by developer, newest first.
Area Science and MathMaintainer Jasper Dekoninck and co-authors (ETH Zurich and INSAIT), on the MathArena platformIntroduced 2025Data version 2026103001, as of 2026-10-30
This evaluation uses the six proof problems of the 2025 USA Mathematical Olympiad, given over two days. A model must write a full natural-language proof for each problem, and each model attempts every problem four times. Two expert graders score each proof against a written scheme, with partial credit, out of 7 points per problem and 42 points in total. The published result is the average of those scores across the four runs.
USAMO 2026 (share of the maximum score)
| Model | Value | Printed by | Setup as printed |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.5OpenAI, released 2026-04-23 | 98.21% | MiniMax, MiniMax M3checked 2026-10-15 | - |
| Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic, released 2026-04-16 | 52.8% | MiniMax, MiniMax M3checked 2026-10-15 | - |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle, released 2026-02-19 | 74.4% | MiniMax, MiniMax M3checked 2026-10-15 | - |
USAMO 2026 (points out of 42)
| Model | Value | Printed by | Setup as printed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax M3MiniMax, released 2026-06-01 | 36 | MiniMax, MiniMax M3checked 2026-10-15 | - |
Every number here is read from the same catalog file as the benchmark table, data version 2026103001, and is the number the table shows for that model and test. Where one page printed a model under several setups, each value is listed. The catalog is public in armanobosyan/sugra-llm-benchmarks; a wrong number can be reported from the table, with Report an error under the value, or as an issue in that repository.