BlogLLM Benchmark Scores as Published, Side by Side

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: Benchmark Scores as Published

Every result the catalog holds for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 147 tests in 17 areas, from 19 pages. 54 printed by Google itself, the rest by the company named beside each number. Each number is as printed; nothing is ranked or rescored.

Developer GoogleReleased 2026-02-19Context window 1.05MMax output 65.5KInput Text, image, video, audio, PDFOutput TextWeights ClosedData version 2026103001, as of 2026-10-30

Knowledge Work

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
AutomationBench9.6%Anthropic, Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5checked 2026-10-15-
GDPval-AA v2965Google, Gemini 3.6 Flash model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 2 more pages-
APEX-Agents33.5%Google, Gemini 3.1 Pro model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 2 more pagesEffort: high
GDPval-AA (Elo)1317Google, Gemini 3.1 Pro model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 4 more pagesEffort: high
Vals Finance Agent v243%Google, Gemini 3.5 Flash model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 1 more page-
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark0%Anthropic, Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5checked 2026-10-15-
OfficeQA Pro18.1%MiniMax, MiniMax M3checked 2026-10-15; printed on 1 more pageHarness: Claude Code
Vals Finance Agent v1.159.7%Anthropic, Claude Opus 4.7checked 2026-10-15; printed on 1 more page-
Vending-Bench 2 (final balance in USD)$911.21Z.ai, GLM-5.1 model cardchecked 2026-10-15-
GDPval (wins or ties)67.3%OpenAI, Introducing GPT-5.5checked 2026-10-15-
GDPval rubrics (pointwise rubric score)57.82%MiniMax, MiniMax M3checked 2026-10-15-
SpreadsheetBench v156.06%MiniMax, MiniMax M3checked 2026-10-15Harness: Claude Code
Management Consulting Tasks (Internal)13.2%OpenAI, GPT-5.6: Frontier intelligence that scales with your ambitionchecked 2026-10-15-
YC-Bench (final assets, USD)$1050000MiniMax, MiniMax M3checked 2026-10-15-

Agentic Coding

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
SWE-bench Verified80.6%Google, Gemini 3.1 Pro model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 5 more pagesEffort: high
SWE-Bench Pro54.2%Google, Gemini 3.1 Pro model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 14 more pagesEffort: high
Terminal-Bench 2.170.3%Google, Gemini 3.5 Flash model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 7 more pagesHarness: Terminus-2
DeepSWE v1.112%Google, Gemini 3.6 Flash model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 2 more pages-
SWE-bench Multilingual76.9%Moonshot AI, Kimi K2.6 model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high; Harness: in-house SWE-agent variant
Terminal-Bench 2.068.5%Google, Gemini 3.1 Pro model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 5 more pagesEffort: high; Harness: Terminus-2
NL2Repo-Bench21.62MiniMax, MiniMax M3checked 2026-10-15; printed on 2 more pages-
SWE-Marathon4%Z.ai, GLM-5.2 model cardchecked 2026-10-15Context: 1000000
ProgramBench39.5%Z.ai, GLM-5.2 model cardchecked 2026-10-15Harness: Claude Code 2.1.156; Context: 400000
SWE-Atlas-QnA (setting not stated)13.5%MiniMax, MiniMax M3checked 2026-10-15-
FrontierSWE (dominance score)39.6Z.ai, GLM-5.2 model cardchecked 2026-10-15Context: 1000000
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.142.7OpenAI, GPT-5.6: Frontier intelligence that scales with your ambitionchecked 2026-10-15-
SWE-Atlas-Test Writing29.84%MiniMax, MiniMax M3checked 2026-10-15-
SWE-fficiency19.7%MiniMax, MiniMax M3checked 2026-10-15Harness: Claude Code
VIBE-Pro41%MiniMax, MiniMax-M2.7 model cardchecked 2026-10-15-
VIBE-V2 (MiniMax internal)28%MiniMax, MiniMax M3checked 2026-10-15Harness: Claude Code

ML Engineering

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
PostTrainBench v1.121.6%Z.ai, GLM-5.2 model cardchecked 2026-10-15Context: 1000000
PaperBench46.7MiniMax, MiniMax M3checked 2026-10-15Harness: Claude Code
MLE-bench42.6%Google, Gemini 3.6 Flash model cardchecked 2026-10-15-
MLE-bench Lite (medal rate)66.6%MiniMax, MiniMax-M2.7 model cardchecked 2026-10-15-
KernelBench Hard (TFLOPs relative to hardware peak)18.6%MiniMax, MiniMax M3checked 2026-10-15Harness: Claude Code
PostTrainBench (version not stated)15.2%MiniMax, MiniMax M3checked 2026-10-15Harness: Claude Code

Science and Math

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
GPQA Diamond94.3%Google, Gemini 3.1 Pro model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 8 more pagesEffort: high; Tools: none
SciCode59%Google, Gemini 3.1 Pro model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 1 more pageEffort: high
IMO-AnswerBench81%DeepSeek, DeepSeek-V4-Pro (preview) model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 3 more pagesEffort: high
AIME 202698.3%Moonshot AI, Kimi K2.6 model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 3 more pagesEffort: high
HMMT November 202594.8%Z.ai, GLM-5.1 model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 1 more page-
HMMT February 202694.7%DeepSeek, DeepSeek-V4-Pro (preview) model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 3 more pagesEffort: high
CritPt17.7%Z.ai, GLM-5.2 model cardchecked 2026-10-15-
MathArena Apex Shortlist89.1%DeepSeek, DeepSeek-V4-Pro (preview) model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high
BioMysteryBench Human Difficult32.9%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25-
BioMysteryBench Human Solvable83.6%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25-
FrontierMath Tier 1-336.9%OpenAI, Introducing GPT-5.5checked 2026-10-15-
FrontierMath Tier 1-3 (v2)59.6%OpenAI, GPT-5.6: Frontier intelligence that scales with your ambitionchecked 2026-10-15-
MathArena Apex60.9%DeepSeek, DeepSeek-V4-Pro (preview) model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high
FrontierMath Tier 416.7%OpenAI, Introducing GPT-5.5checked 2026-10-15-
Protocol Understanding (V2)52.8%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25-
Protocols Troubleshooting58.1%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25-
GeneBench Pro3.1%OpenAI, GPT-5.6: Frontier intelligence that scales with your ambitionchecked 2026-10-15-
Organic chemistry V245.9%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25-
ProteinGym Hard37%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25-
ArXivMath (June 2026), without tools65.99%Anthropic, System Card: Claude Fable 5.1 & Claude Mythos 5.1checked 2026-10-25Tools: none
USAMO 2026 (share of the maximum score)74.4%MiniMax, MiniMax M3checked 2026-10-15-

Long Context

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
MRCR v2 8-needle 128K84.9%Google, Gemini 3.1 Pro model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 2 more pagesEffort: high; Context: 128k (average)
MRCR v2 8-needle 1M (pointwise)26.3%Google, Gemini 3.1 Pro model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 2 more pagesEffort: high; Context: 1M (pointwise)
CorpusQA 1M53.8%DeepSeek, DeepSeek-V4-Pro (preview) model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high; Context: 1M
MRCR 1M (MMR)76.3%DeepSeek, DeepSeek-V4-Pro (preview) model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high; Context: 1M

Computer Use

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
OSWorld-Verified76.2%Google, Gemini 3.5 Flash model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 4 more pages-

Multimodal Understanding

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
CharXiv Reasoning (no tools)83.3%Google, Gemini 3.5 Flash model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 3 more pagesTools: none
MMMU-Pro80.5%Google, Gemini 3.1 Pro model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 6 more pagesEffort: high; Tools: none
MathVision89.8%Moonshot AI, Kimi K2.6 model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high; Tools: none
GDP.pdf16.7%Anthropic, Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5checked 2026-10-15; printed on 1 more pageTools: none
CharXiv Reasoning (with tools)83.2%Google, Gemini 3.6 Flash model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 2 more pagesTools: enabled; exact tools in source
BabyVision (with tools)68.3%Moonshot AI, Kimi K2.6 model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high; Tools: python
MMMU-Pro (with tools)85.3%Moonshot AI, Kimi K2.6 model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high; Tools: python
OmniDocBench 1.588.1%MiniMax, MiniMax M3checked 2026-10-15-
Video-MMMU87.9%MiniMax, MiniMax M3checked 2026-10-15-
BabyVision (no tools)51.6%Moonshot AI, Kimi K2.6 model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high; Tools: none
Video-MME (with subtitles)87.9%MiniMax, MiniMax M3checked 2026-10-15-
MathVision (with tools)95.7%Moonshot AI, Kimi K2.6 model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high; Tools: python
V* Bench (with tools)96.9%Moonshot AI, Kimi K2.6 model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high; Tools: python
Audio MC66.8%Thinking Machines, Thinking Machines Inkling model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high
MMAU82.5%Thinking Machines, Thinking Machines Inkling model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high
VoiceBench94.3%Thinking Machines, Thinking Machines Inkling model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high

Cybersecurity

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
CyberGym38.8%Z.ai, GLM-5.1 model cardchecked 2026-10-15-

General Knowledge and Reasoning

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
Humanity's Last Exam (no tools)44.4%Google, Gemini 3.1 Pro model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 10 more pagesEffort: high; Tools: none
MMLU-Pro91%DeepSeek, DeepSeek-V4-Pro (preview) model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)51.4%Google, Gemini 3.1 Pro model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 9 more pagesEffort: high; Tools: search (blocklist), code
SimpleQA Verified75.6%DeepSeek, DeepSeek-V4-Pro (preview) model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 1 more pageEffort: high
ARC-AGI-277.1%Google, Gemini 3.1 Pro model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 2 more pagesEffort: high
AA-Omniscience Index33Thinking Machines, Thinking Machines Inkling model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high
ARC-AGI-198%OpenAI, Introducing GPT-5.5checked 2026-10-15-
Chinese SimpleQA85.9%DeepSeek, DeepSeek-V4-Pro (preview) model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high
ARC-AGI-30.42%OpenAI, GPT-5.6: Frontier intelligence that scales with your ambitionchecked 2026-10-15-
CL-bench21.06%MiniMax, MiniMax M3checked 2026-10-15-

Code Generation

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
LiveCodeBench v691.7%Moonshot AI, Kimi K2.6 model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high
Codeforces rating3052DeepSeek, DeepSeek-V4-Pro (preview) model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high
LiveCodeBench (version not stated)91.7%DeepSeek, DeepSeek-V4-Pro (preview) model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high
LiveSQLBench (Base-Full v1)39.83%MiniMax, MiniMax M3checked 2026-10-15Harness: Claude Code
SVG-Bench (MiniMax internal)59.2%MiniMax, MiniMax M3checked 2026-10-15Harness: Claude Code
OJBench (Python)70.7%Moonshot AI, Kimi K2.6 model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high
LiveCodeBench Pro (Elo)2887Google, Gemini 3.1 Pro model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high

Tool Use and Workflows

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
Toolathlon48.8%DeepSeek, DeepSeek-V4-Pro (preview) model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 6 more pagesEffort: high
τ³-bench Banking16.5%Thinking Machines, Thinking Machines Inkling model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high
τ²-bench Telecom99.3%Google, Gemini 3.1 Pro model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high
MCP Atlas69.2%Google, Gemini 3.1 Pro model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 4 more pagesEffort: high
τ²-bench Retail90.8%Google, Gemini 3.1 Pro model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high
MCP Atlas (public set)69.2%DeepSeek, DeepSeek-V4-Pro (preview) model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 3 more pagesEffort: high
MCPMark55.9%Moonshot AI, Kimi K2.6 model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high
Claw-Eval pass^357.8%MiniMax, MiniMax M3checked 2026-10-15; printed on 1 more page-
Agents' Last Exam (score)32.1%OpenAI, GPT-5.6: Frontier intelligence that scales with your ambitionchecked 2026-10-15-
τ³-bench (domain not stated)67.1%Z.ai, GLM-5.1 model cardchecked 2026-10-15-
BankerToolBench67.03%MiniMax, MiniMax M3checked 2026-10-15-
MM-ClawBench61.8%MiniMax, MiniMax-M2.7 model cardchecked 2026-10-15-
Claw-Eval pass@382.9%Moonshot AI, Kimi K2.6 model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high

Web Search and Research

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
BrowseComp85.9%Google, Gemini 3.1 Pro model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 8 more pagesEffort: high; Tools: search, python, browse
DeepSearchQA (accuracy)60.2%Moonshot AI, Kimi K2.6 model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high; Tools: search, code interpreter, browsing
DeepSearchQA (F1)81.9%Moonshot AI, Kimi K2.6 model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high; Tools: search, code interpreter, browsing

Instruction Following

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
IFBench77.1Thinking Machines, Thinking Machines Inkling model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high

Multilingual

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
MMMLU92.6%Google, Gemini 3.1 Pro model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 1 more pageEffort: high
Global-MMLU-Lite92.7%Thinking Machines, Thinking Machines Inkling model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high

Safety and Alignment

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
FORTRESS (Adversarial)65.2%Thinking Machines, Thinking Machines Inkling model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high
FORTRESS (Benign)98%Thinking Machines, Thinking Machines Inkling model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high
StrongREJECT98%Thinking Machines, Thinking Machines Inkling model cardchecked 2026-10-15Effort: high
Primary misbehavior judge score, overall (18 tasks)lower is better7.11Google, Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Reportchecked 2026-10-19-
Agent Harnesses: Helpfulness77.25%Google, Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Reportchecked 2026-10-19-
Agent Harnesses: Safe Action Rate68.23%Google, Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Reportchecked 2026-10-19-
Child Sexual Abuse and Exploitation Safety99.09%Google, Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Reportchecked 2026-10-19-
Coding Agent Robustness: survival at 40 attempts4%Google, Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Reportchecked 2026-10-19-
Computer Use Robustness (adaptive scenarios): survival at 100 attempts11%Google, Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Reportchecked 2026-10-19-
Contextual Security Robustness: baseline (no adversary)47%Google, Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Reportchecked 2026-10-19-
Contextual Security Robustness: survival at 1 attempt (static)47%Google, Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Reportchecked 2026-10-19-
Contextual Security Robustness: survival at 15 attempts (adaptive)0%Google, Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Reportchecked 2026-10-19-
Dangerous Content Safety (multi-turn)97.8%Google, Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Reportchecked 2026-10-19-
Dangerous Content Safety (single-turn)93.2%Google, Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Reportchecked 2026-10-19-
Grounding Robustness (RAG indirect prompt injection): survival at 40 attempts3%Google, Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Reportchecked 2026-10-19-
Hate and Harassment Safety (multi-turn)94.6%Google, Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Reportchecked 2026-10-19-
Hate and Harassment Safety (single-turn)98.5%Google, Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Reportchecked 2026-10-19-
Helpfulness Across Benign Over-Refusal Benchmarks (multi-turn)89.1%Google, Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Reportchecked 2026-10-19-
Helpfulness Across Benign Over-Refusal Benchmarks (multimodal)67.5%Google, Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Reportchecked 2026-10-19-
Helpfulness Across Benign Over-Refusal Benchmarks (single-turn)87%Google, Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Reportchecked 2026-10-19-
Personal-Device Assistant Robustness: adaptive survival (ARR@5)50%Google, Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Reportchecked 2026-10-19-
Personal-Device Assistant Robustness: clean control task utility89%Google, Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Reportchecked 2026-10-19-
Personal-Device Assistant Robustness: task utility under attack81%Google, Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Reportchecked 2026-10-19-
Sexually Explicit Content Safety (multi-turn)95.6%Google, Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Reportchecked 2026-10-19-
Sexually Explicit Content Safety (single-turn)96.6%Google, Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Reportchecked 2026-10-19-
Turn injections in tool use: survival at 1 attempt (static)39%Google, Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Reportchecked 2026-10-19-
Turn injections in tool use: survival at 100 attempts11%Google, Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Reportchecked 2026-10-19-
Turn injections in tool use: survival at 150 attempts8%Google, Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Reportchecked 2026-10-19-
Performs misaligned action (Gram rollouts, no verbalized evaluation awareness)lower is better0%Google, Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Reportchecked 2026-10-19-

Engineering and Design

TestValuePrinted bySetup as printed
Blueprint-Bench 2 (normalized score)26.5%Google, Gemini 3.5 Flash model cardchecked 2026-10-15; printed on 1 more page-

Preference and Composite Rankings

Price

API list prices in US dollars per one million tokens, as printed on the developer's pricing page on the day checked. Cost per task is measured by Vals AI.

PriceValuePrinted bySetup as printed
Input$2Google, Gemini API pricingchecked 2026-10-15Context: up to 200,000 tokens; Long context: $4 per 1M tokens above 200,000 tokens
Cached input$0.2Google, Gemini API pricingchecked 2026-10-15Context: up to 200,000 tokens; Long context: $0.4 per 1M tokens above 200,000 tokens
Output$12Google, Gemini API pricingchecked 2026-10-15Context: up to 200,000 tokens; Long context: $18 per 1M tokens above 200,000 tokens
Input, batch$1Google, Gemini API pricingchecked 2026-10-15Context: up to 200,000 tokens; Long context: $2 per 1M tokens above 200,000 tokens
Cached input, batch$0.2Google, Gemini API pricingchecked 2026-10-15Context: up to 200,000 tokens; Long context: $0.4 per 1M tokens above 200,000 tokens
Output, batch$6Google, Gemini API pricingchecked 2026-10-15Context: up to 200,000 tokens; Long context: $9 per 1M tokens above 200,000 tokens
Input, flex$1Google, Gemini API pricingchecked 2026-10-15Context: up to 200,000 tokens; Long context: $2 per 1M tokens above 200,000 tokens
Cached input, flex$0.2Google, Gemini API pricingchecked 2026-10-15Context: up to 200,000 tokens; Long context: $0.4 per 1M tokens above 200,000 tokens
Output, flex$6Google, Gemini API pricingchecked 2026-10-15Context: up to 200,000 tokens; Long context: $9 per 1M tokens above 200,000 tokens
Input, priority$3.6Google, Gemini API pricingchecked 2026-10-15Context: up to 200,000 tokens; Long context: $7.2 per 1M tokens above 200,000 tokens
Cached input, priority$0.36Google, Gemini API pricingchecked 2026-10-15Context: up to 200,000 tokens; Long context: $0.72 per 1M tokens above 200,000 tokens
Output, priority$21.6Google, Gemini API pricingchecked 2026-10-15Context: up to 200,000 tokens; Long context: $32.4 per 1M tokens above 200,000 tokens
Input, contributor$1Google, Gemini API pricingchecked 2026-10-15Context: up to 200,000 tokens; Long context: $2 per 1M tokens above 200,000 tokens
Cached input, contributor$0.1Google, Gemini API pricingchecked 2026-10-15Context: up to 200,000 tokens; Long context: $0.2 per 1M tokens above 200,000 tokens
Output, contributor$6Google, Gemini API pricingchecked 2026-10-15Context: up to 200,000 tokens; Long context: $9 per 1M tokens above 200,000 tokens
Cost per taskVals AI, USD, lower is better$3.83Vals AI, Vibe Code Bench v1.1 leaderboardchecked 2026-10-27Harness: OpenHands

More from Google

Every number here is read from the same catalog file as the benchmark table, data version 2026103001. Where one page printed the model under several setups, each value is listed. The catalog is public in armanobosyan/sugra-llm-benchmarks; a wrong number can be reported from the table, with Report an error under the value, or as an issue in that repository.